[DXLog.net - Support] Missing from DXL for RTTY mode
Peter Helfenstein
peter.helfenstein at bluewin.ch
Fri Sep 25 16:31:39 CEST 2015
Hi James,
I am with you on this point. There are many features on my wish list for
DXL too, especially regarding digi. I fully agree with your comments
when it comes to a comparison with products like N1MM or 5M. Still I am
optimistic that these points can all be addressed the sophisticated way
by DXL, especially when I see the responsiveness of Chris.
73, Peter
Am 25.09.2015 um 15:31 schrieb James Balls:
>
> Hi Peter
>
> Yes for so2v and so2r the dual entry line in DXL is king ... But im
> talking MS run station with multi receivers and antennas i want just
> on log entry line but multi decoders for rtty only
>
> Jim
>
> On 25 Sep 2015 13:46, "Peter Helfenstein"
> <peter.helfenstein at bluewin.ch <mailto:peter.helfenstein at bluewin.ch>>
> wrote:
>
> James, Marco,
> For me Marco's point "N1MM is actually opening a separate window
> for VFO B in SO2V mode, that is actually even more confusing as I
> have to use the mouse to select the 2nd window before entering
> anything."
> is key and an important differentiator to N1MM. It is a lot
> easier/reducing stress jumping from VFO to VFO pressing a key
> instead of clicking the mouse!
> And with the new "SPLIT mode" in 2.2.17 SO2V also runs on the
> FT-2000! Many thanks Chris.
> Good luck and see you all in the contest!
> 73, Peter - HB9BUN
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 08:52:04 +0200
>
> From: "Marco HB9CAT" <hb9cat at thezollingers.org
> <mailto:hb9cat at thezollingers.org>>
> To: "'James Balls'" <makidoja at gmail.com
> <mailto:makidoja at gmail.com>>, <support at dxlog.net
> <mailto:support at dxlog.net>>
>
> Subject: Re: [DXLog.net - Support] Missing from DXL for RTTY mode
>
> James,
>
> it's not an option as you then get 2 log entry lines
> and it becomes
>
> confusing
>
> Getting 2 log entry lines is actually exactly what I'm looking
> for while
> running SO2R (same for SO2V), as it allows me to manage 2
> different QSOs
> concurrently; it may indeed look confusing, but that's the
> price to pay to
> increase the rate.
>
> N1MM is actually opening a separate window for VFO B in SO2V
> mode, that is
> actually even more confusing as I have to use the mouse to
> select the 2nd
> window before entering anything.
>
> Diversity: if you're referring to the specific K3
> functionality, the audio
> stream becomes Mono as you turn it on (the sub RX QRG matches
> the main RX)
> so you would have have a single VFO with max 4 decoders on the
> same audio
> stream and a single entry window.
>
> Generally: I agree that right now N1MM still has a distinct
> advantage on
> RTTY
>
> 73s, Marco HB9CAT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: support-bounces at dxlog.net
> <mailto:support-bounces at dxlog.net>
> [mailto:support-bounces at dxlog.net
> <mailto:support-bounces at dxlog.net>] On Behalf
> Of James Balls
> Sent: mercoled?, 23. settembre 2015 16:54
> To: support at dxlog.net <mailto:support at dxlog.net>
> Subject: [DXLog.net - Support] Missing from DXL for RTTY mode
>
> Hi Chris / All
>
> >From an RTTY stance I think N1MM has a distinct advantage
> over DXL for RTTY
> in the MS category
>
> Missing for me is the option to have upto 4 RX decoders per
> receiver but in
> the same window.
>
> Also I would like to have the main and sub VFO in separate
> windows, at the
> moment the only way to do this is by having SO2R or SO2V
> option enabled, but
> for multi single it's not an option as you then get 2 log
> entry lines and it
> becomes confusing.
>
> I would like to have the option of decoding both main and sub
> receivers with
> upto 4 decoders per receiver, all in the two decoder windows
> with dividers
> between them (like N1MM)
>
> OR 6 decoders in the same window which would work for
> diversity mode.
>
> This would allow me to stack and work anything I hear with the
> K3 in
> diversity RX mode as we often use 2 different antennas at the
> same time with
> the dual receivers and diversity on.
>
> Is this something that could be implemented please?
>
> I really wanted to use DXL for CQWW RTTY but the limitation
> above means I
> have to use N1MM + which i'm not keen on.
>
> Jim M0CKE
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at dxlog.net <mailto:Support at dxlog.net>
> http://www.dxlog.net/mailman/listinfo/support
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at dxlog.net <mailto:Support at dxlog.net>
> http://www.dxlog.net/mailman/listinfo/support
>
>
> End of Support Digest, Vol 28, Issue 8
> **************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at dxlog.net <mailto:Support at dxlog.net>
> http://www.dxlog.net/mailman/listinfo/support
>
More information about the Support
mailing list